Solutions
Add sites without splitting your hiring criteria
The same background is rated differently at different sites. Share one set of questions and evaluation criteria and that becomes much less likely.
Challenge
As you add sites, the criteria drift apart
Nobody changes them on purpose; they drift through day-to-day practice. The result is that hiring quality can no longer be compared across sites.
- Different interviewers at each site
- Applicant pools differ by region, and each site develops its own sense of what a good candidate looks like
- Head office can set the standard, but whether it is applied in the room is up to the interviewer
01
Designed at head office
Decide the questions and criteria
02
The same setup at every site
The standard is built in, not handed out
03
AI interviews at each site
Candidates take them when it suits them
04
Scores on one shared standard
Generated for each criterion
05
Comparable across sites
Each site’s hiring team decides
The three shaded steps are automated. The pass-or-fail decision is made by a person.
Solution
Build the standard in, rather than hand it out
Every site uses the same questions and evaluation criteria designed at head office. Because the scores come from the same criteria, results line up across sites.
- Every site uses the same questions and criteria
- Comparable on one shared standard
- A new site can adopt the existing setup as-is
- Every site shows candidates the same company and job briefing
Related pages
More detail, by topic
Differences between sites come both from how the criteria are set and from how they are interpreted.
Set the criteria first and reduce variation between interviewers.
Same answer, different score: when interviewers read the criteria differently →
Use gaps between human and AI scores to find where interpretations diverge, and fix the criteria.
Staffing registration interviews →
Run registration interviews around the clock, with the same checks at every branch.
AI interview services compared →
The leading services, sorted by what they optimise for and compared on questions, criteria and verification, using public information.
Frequently asked questions
Can the evaluation summary be produced in English?
The evaluation summary can be switched between Japanese and English, and the two can be viewed side by side.
Can some criteria differ by site?
Yes. You register a job title and job description for each role and set the questions and criteria for it. You can share one setup across all sites or split it by site or role, depending on how you operate.
Can we see differences in evaluation between sites?
Scores are recorded per criterion, so the distribution shows the criteria on which judgement diverges. The AI evaluation and a human reviewer’s can also be recorded side by side.
Does the candidate need to prepare anything?
A browser is all they need. It works on desktop, smartphone and tablet, with no app to install, and no need to travel to one of your sites.
Tell us how hiring practice differs between your sites
We will show what to standardise and what to leave with each site. Free, about 30 minutes.